Yvonne Bohwongprasert, a former newspaper journalist with more than 26 years’experience covering social issues, lifestyle and entertainment, reflects on theremarkable rise of Thai Girl Love — and what happens when the emotional investment of devoted fans becomes part of the business model.
UNTIL A few years ago, Girl Love, or GL, was not really on my radar. As a straightwoman, I had never felt particularly compelled to explore the genre. Professionally,
however, I had spent years writing about LGBTQI+ issues and had close family members and friends from the community, so I understood the importance of representation.
What I did not understand was the world that had grown around GL — the fandoms, fan meetings, merchandise, international travel, intense online discussions, fan service and,
perhaps most importantly, the extraordinary emotional and financial investment some fans make in the actresses they admire.
Then came GAP: The Series. And suddenly I found myself looking at GL in a completely different light.
GAP Opened a Whole New World
Released in 2022 and starring Freen Sarocha Chankimha and Rebecca Patricia Armstrong, better known as Becky, GAP was adapted from Chao Planoy’s novel Pink Theory. I watched the first couple of episodes but eventually stopped. One intimate love scene made me uncomfortable because, to me, it felt more intimate than necessary to tell the story. Call me old school. At the time, I also did not think the storyline or acting was particularly remarkable.
Yet GAP became an international phenomenon. Millions of views, international fan communities and a level of devotion I had never associated with a Thai television series made me wonder what I had missed.
Looking back at clips and following some of the discussions surrounding the actresses, I began to understand that this was not simply about whether viewers liked a television
romance. The chemistry between the two actresses had taken on a life of its own and, to me, felt genuine.
And that raised a question that has stayed with me ever since: where does the fictional relationship end and the commercial fantasy begin?
From BL Blueprint to a Global GL Business
Thai GL did not have to reinvent the wheel. Much of its business model follows the country’s enormously successful Boys Love industry.
Both genres often introduce fresh faces as leads and build their careers around a carefully marketed pairing. The professional partnership between two actors becomes a brand, extending beyond a series or film into promotional events, social media, fan meetings, overseas appearances, merchandise and endorsements.
Thai BL demonstrated that two actors could become more than the characters they played. They could become a pairing — or “ship” — with its own commercial value. Strong on-screen chemistry, reinforced by fan service, can generate an entire ecosystem around the stars.
GL followed a similar path. But for many women-loving-women viewers, particularly LGBTQI+ audiences, the emotional stakes can be much deeper. Seeing two women fall in love, overcome obstacles and sometimes reach a happy ending offers something that has historically been missing from mainstream entertainment.
That emotional connection has helped make Thai GL an increasingly lucrative industry and part of the country’s broader soft-power ambitions. It has created opportunities not
only for actresses and production companies, but also for Thai fashion, beauty, brands, events and tourism.
Thai GL has therefore become much more than another television genre. It is a cultural export.
But once a genre becomes serious business, entertainment and commerce become harder to separate. The question is no longer simply whether audiences enjoy a show. It is also how much they are encouraged to invest in the people behind it — and whether that investment is based on genuine enjoyment or emotional attachment to a fantasy.
Why GL Means So Much to Its Fans
There is a tendency to talk about fandom as though it simply means people sitting at home watching television. It does not.
Devoted fans give something much more valuable than a television rating: their time, attention, loyalty and often their hard-earned money. They buy products, attend fan meetings, travel across continents for events, purchase tickets and merchandise, promote their idols online and support new projects.
Some are simply devoted fans who enjoy the actresses and their work. Others become what I would describe as often infatuated fans — people for whom the connection with a particular actress or pairing becomes deeply personal, sometimes to the point that they
cannot tolerate hearing anything negative about them.
That devotion should not be mocked or dismissed as irrational.
For an LGBTQI+ viewer who has spent years feeling unseen, watching two women find love and acceptance can mean far more than entertainment. A GL couple can represent possibility, hope and the simple feeling of being represented.
There is nothing wrong with fans spending money on something they love. Entertainment has always been commercial. The problem begins when emotional vulnerability itself becomes part of what is being sold.
A fan may buy a ticket, merchandise or a plane ticket because she loves an actress. But buying that experience does not buy ownership of the actress. The fan owns the experience; the actress owns her life.
That distinction matters.
When Fan Service Becomes the Product
Fan service is not inherently a bad thing. Actors understand that audiences enjoy seeing favourite pairings together. A playful interaction, a warm comment or some teasing between co-stars can be part of promoting a show.
The problem comes when promotion deliberately blurs the line between performance and reality.
A glance becomes evidence. A touch becomes evidence. A photograph becomes evidence. A teasing comment becomes evidence. Before long, some devoted fans are no longer simply supporting fictional characters. They are trying to determine whether the actresses are secretly in love or seriously dating in real life.
If a commercial machine depends on audiences believing that two actresses are more than colleagues, the emotional consequences of that illusion cannot simply be blamed on the fans when things go wrong.
The actresses are entitled to private lives, relationships and career choices. There is nothing wrong with an actress having a boyfriend, being single or choosing to keep her personal life private.
What deserves scrutiny is whether the industry deliberately encourages audiences to believe something that is not true because that fantasy is commercially valuable.
Be a good professional partner. Be warm. Give fans something to enjoy. But there should be limits. Keeping fans delusional should never be the business strategy.
And responsibility does not rest with actresses alone. Agencies, producers, event organisers and brands all play a role in shaping the image audiences are encouraged to buy into.
Because the fans are not imaginary. They are human beings with feelings and emotions — and they are the people buying the tickets.
When Fantasy Starts to Hurt
For many fans, none of this causes a problem. They understand the difference between fantasy and reality and enjoy the entertainment for what it is.
But not everyone can maintain that distance.
A photograph with another person can trigger anxiety. A different co-star can provoke anger. A lack of affection between two actresses can be interpreted as evidence of a breakup. A dating rumour can feel like personal betrayal.
This is where fandom can become emotionally damaging and, in some cases, toxic.
Parasocial attachment is not new, but GL can add another layer because the relationship being sold is often not simply between a fan and an actress. It is between a fan and a couple. For some LGBTQI+ fans, that couple can carry enormous personal meaning.
This is also where the debate around queerbaiting becomes particularly sensitive. Suggesting or teasing queer attraction to attract LGBTQI+ audiences without meaningful queer representation can create a sense of betrayal. In GL, the situation is
more complicated because the actresses are real people while the romantic relationship is fictional, at least for most.
Playing a lesbian character does not mean an actress is lesbian. Having extraordinary chemistry with another woman does not mean the two are romantically involved. Fan service does not automatically mean a real relationship exists.
Fans deserve to know where the story ends and the performance begins.
That does not mean celebrities owe the public details of their private lives. They do not. But when an industry deliberately keeps audiences confused about the distinction, it should not be surprised when some fans begin looking for answers themselves —
sometimes by crossing boundaries they should respect.
When Devotion Turns Into Backlash
The same devoted fan who spends money supporting an actress can become deeply hurt when she believes she has been misled. A disappointed fan can sometimes become more hostile than an ordinary critic.
Social media makes this particularly dangerous. Some disgruntled fans send hate to an actress they believe has wronged them. Others troll or stalk her online, while some go
as far as seeking private information to discredit her publicly.
But discovering information does not automatically create a right to know everything.
Public figures surrender some privacy because of their profession, but not all privacy.
There is also a difference between deciding that you no longer want to support an actress and remaining obsessed with everything she does simply to criticise her. If someone no longer wants to be a fan, perhaps the healthiest response is to stop
following, stop buying and move on.
Fandom wars can also turn ugly, with cyberbullying, personal attacks and attempts to damage an actress’s reputation or commercial relationships. Claims about private lives
can spread rapidly, often without verification.
Everyone has a role in maintaining boundaries — fans, actresses, agencies and brands.
The Price of Selling the Illusion
There is an uncomfortable question at the heart of all this: if the pairing is the product, what happens when the product needs to change?
The commercial temptation is obvious. If audiences love a particular couple, why separate them? If fan service generates engagement, why reduce it? If overseas fans are willing to travel thousands of kilometres for a particular pairing, why stop selling it?
But actresses are not products.
Their careers should be allowed to develop beyond the relationship audiences have become attached to. The industry needs to create stars, not just ships — actresses who can build lasting careers through their talent rather than remain commercially dependent
on one pairing.
The same applies to fans. They should be free to support an actress without feeling that their loyalty requires them to keep buying everything associated with her.
This is why I understand the frustration behind comments from some disgruntled fans who have described the GL and BL entertainment model as a kind of “syndicated scam”— arguing that the industry thrives by capitalising on a community hungry for representation.
That is a serious accusation and should not be treated as fact. But the fact that some fans feel exploited is itself worth examining.
If people are repeatedly encouraged to invest emotionally and financially in a relationship that may not exist outside the promotional environment, the industry cannot simply dismiss their disappointment as fans being unreasonable.
The industry is entitled to make money from fandom. Fans are entitled to spend their money as they choose.
The ethical question is whether the business is selling enjoyment — or deliberately exploiting emotional vulnerability.
GL Should Be a Doorway, Not a Prison
The greatest danger for a successful GL actress may ultimately be becoming trapped inside the very pairing that made her famous.
A successful actress should be able to take on a challenging role with another woman without fans accusing her of abandoning her partner. She should be able to act opposite a man without being accused of betrayal. She should be able to pursue fashion, music, film, television or completely different creative work without being permanently defined by her co-star.
A GL pairing should open doors for an actress, not become the door she can never leave.
For the industr y to remain healthy, new actresses and new stories with solid plots and strong production values also need room to emerge. If commercial success depends too heavily on selling intimate scenes, the genre risks becoming less about telling meaningful stories and more about protecting an existing formula.
GL should create stars with careers beyond a pairing. It should create stories audiences remember for more than a few bedroom clips circulating online. And it should continue giving LGBTQI+ viewers representation that means more than a marketing campaign.
What GL Has Given — And What It Owes Its Fans
There is much to celebrate.
Thai GL has created opportunities for actresses who might previously have struggled to find leading roles in stories centred on women loving women. It has brought LGBTQI+ relationships into mainstream entertainment, given international audiences stories of love that do not necessarily end in tragedy, and created jobs, business opportunities and international exposure for Thai entertainment.
Most importantly, it has given many viewers something that cannot be measured by box-office receipts or social-media numbers: hope.
But success creates responsibility.
The industry cannot ask fans to spend their money, travel across borders, promote its stars and defend them online — and then treat those same fans as troublesome when they ask for honesty.
Nor should fans believe that spending money entitles them to control an actress’s private life.
Both sides need boundaries. The actresses deserve privacy. The fans deserve honesty.
I believe the simplest lesson is also the most pivotal one: devoted fans do not owe the industry blind loyalty for the time, money and emotional investment they have already given, nor should the industry take that devotion for granted simply because the money keeps coming.
Let the romance remain on screen when that is where it belongs. Let the friendship remain real without turning it into evidence of a secret relationship. Let actresses have private lives without making fans feel betrayed for not being part of them.
And let devoted — even often infatuated — fans continue to love what they love without being manipulated into believing something that does not exist.
Because ultimately, the people who built Thai GL’s success are not just the producers, brands or actresses. They are the fans — the people who watched, shared, travelled, bought the tickets, purchased the merchandise, promoted the stars and kept supporting their idols when the cameras stopped rolling.
If Thai GL wants to remain a global phenomenon, perhaps the most valuable thing it can protect is not the illusion of romance, but the trust of the people who made that phenomenon possible: its devoted fans.
Thai GL has reached a remarkable point in its evolution. Its future should not depend on making fans believe more intensely in a relationship between two actresses. It should depend on giving them better stories, stronger performances and actresses free to become more than one half of a famous pairing.
And yes, tone down the love scenes, GL directors. Having multiple French-kissing scenes in every GL can lower the genre’s standards. You may argue that sex sells, but when intimacy becomes the selling point at the expense of story, character and acting, the line between meaningful GL drama and soft-porn-style entertainment becomes uncomfortably blurred.
That is not the future GL deserves.
CAPTION:
Images from GAP: The Series. Credit: Imdb.com
Also read:
Netanyahu, Trump speeches at UN flag Israel, US as biggest threats to Travel & Tourism
25 years later, WoT has the “War on Terror” achieved?
Veteran US journalist laments the Lost Horizons of Asia and America
Gulf visitor arrivals save Thai tourism from low season disaster
Feature: Interest-wise, Thais may root for West Ham survival
Housing market recovers in H1 with transfers soaring 17.6%
Kasikorn Research Centre sets flood-induced economic damage at 7–17 billion baht
